Respond to these rapid questions in our Children Of The Corn quiz and we will tell you which Children Of The Corn character you are. Play it now.
Based on Stephen King’s short story, the latest “Children of the Corn” movie will be released nearly 40 years after the first one. Both the first and the most recent “Children of the Corn” movies are technically excellent, conceptually weak, and superficially upsetting body count thrillers with kiddy cultists who worship corn. While the original “Children of the Corn” reportedly cost $800,000 to make, it somehow doesn’t look as cheap as this new “Children of the Corn,” which ultimately delivers just enough formulaic violence.
A lot of dramatic shorthand and clichés are used in the new “Children of the Corn,” and there are far too many sequences that appear to have been over-edited rather than thoughtfully directed. That’s acceptable given that the title of this film serves as the primary source of familiarity and/or nostalgia for viewers. Although this “Children of the Corn” is stupid, nasty, and unnecessary, fantasy film fans—especially those who know writer/director Kurt “gun fu” Wimmer without having to look him up on IMDb—might still find something to like.
Some now-expected plot elements are not established by Wimmer for a while. In order to bury their failing corn crops, the impoverished and desperate farmers of Rylstone, Nebraska—who were actually portrayed by Rylstone, Australia—must consider accepting a payoff. Eleven-year-old Boleyn (Elena Kampouris) begs her dejected father Robert (Callan Mulvey) to reconsider selling the farm outright, but neither he nor his neighbors have many other choices. The Rylstone Children’s Home orphans, led by the resentful and possibly soulless youngster Eden (Kate Moyer), are also upset about being excluded from this important discussion. At a town gathering, they say as much, but the adults laugh them off with cartoonish mockery.
But you shouldn’t waste any more time and start this Children Of The Corn quiz.
By reminding his fellow corn-shuckers that they are making fun of children, Robert attempts to restore order. Soon after, Eden and her group begin killing people in the name of He Who Walks (shortened from the original tale and movies’ “He Who Walks Behind the Rows”), a shadowy deity-like figure who demands blind allegiance and bloody sacrifices. After about 40+ thankless minutes of dramatic setup and throat-clearing, Boleyn attempts to appease Eden, but “Children of the Corn” really belongs to Eden and her murderous friends.
Children Of The Corn Quiz
Since you’re presumably a fan of the franchise or a Stephen King fan if you’re watching a new “Children of the Corn” movie in 2023, you probably already know what happens. It’s not a matter of ruthless or even dependable category craftsmanship that makes Wimmer’s take on “Children of the Corn,” his first directing gig since “Ultraviolet” in 2006, startling. Instead, Wimmer’s design has just enough flair to buckle but maintain its structural integrity before it transforms into the threshing machine from a horror film.
Also, you will find out which character are you in this Children Of The Corn quiz.
The majority of the ensemble is underutilized by Wimmer’s sparse dialogue, which is more boring than bad. A few adult performers, including Mulvey and Bruce Spence, who plays a minor character as a jeremiad-prone pastor, hit their marks with enough force. Even the younger actors on the ensemble are watchable, if not always interesting. The biggest shock comes from Moyer, who frequently comes across as menacing despite her character’s overall lack of depth or emotional range. She glistens and snarls with a firm but unassuming determination at anyone who stands in her way. Then, until it’s time to end, bad things continue to happen to the residents of Rylstone.
About the quiz
The gruesome, highlight reel-worthy kill sequences in this movie are not significantly diminished by Wimmer’s blindness. If anything, the film’s cheap atmosphere of foreboding is unintentionally enhanced by artless close-ups, a tacky sepia camera filter, and plywood dialogue. As a tale of small-town kids who must compete for the scraps of what is left after witnessing their adult caretakers abandon their homes, this adaptation of “Children of the Corn” falls flat. Even so, this adaptation of Stephen King’s tale succeeds as a cruel literary experiment. Although horror fans have undoubtedly seen darker and more unsettling films like this, Wimmer and the gang are focused enough to make a few significant deaths seem disturbing nonetheless.
Also, you must try to play this Children Of The Corn quiz.
If you came upon this “Children of the Corn” at your neighborhood Blockbuster Video, you might believe you had discovered hidden treasure. It’s just a shame that seeing such a watchable timewaster requires more effort than it’s worth due to the decentralized nature of contemporary VOD/streaming/day-and-date releases. When I asked Twitter to highlight notable sequels to the original 1984 “Children of the Corn,” I was encouraged to receive a few different suggestions, and their responses also speak to the durability of this material, which hasn’t aged much and still grazes the same buttons it used to.
On March 21, it will be accessible digitally and is currently showing in cinemas.
